Tuesday, July 23, 2013

Interpretation of New Energy Code

John D’Annunzio

 
The Energy Crisis (as it was labeled) in the United States in the late 1970s initiated the wide spread installation of above deck thermal insulation boards on low-slope roof systems. Prior to that time insulation was used in specific regions of the country and primarily as a substrate for built-up roof applications. Oil shortages drove up heating costs and the industry started to investigate energy savings through the use of thermal insulation.

Polyisocyanurates and Polystyrenes were introduced to the commercial low-slope market in the eighties and many federal and state facilities (schools) began requiring that higher R-value insulations be applied on their facilities. There were unwritten rules as to specific R-values, however these were largely voluntary measures and were not actual code requirements.

That has changed. The new Energy Codes – which are becoming part of local and federal building codes – are specific as to the required R-value of the insulation system on low-slope roof systems. This will have an impact on all of the low-slope roof systems that you design, so you should be aware of these requirements and specifically how they are regulated in your area.

Below is the code interpretation of the 2009 International Energy Conservation Code relating to low-slope commercial facilities:

This code establishes the minimum R-value required for insulation above the deck on commercial buildings. The thermal R-value required for insulation applied entirely above the deck is based on climate zones in the chart listed below. The code indicates that the thermal R-value prescribed is for the insulation only and does not include other building materials or air films.

TABLE 502.2(1)

BUILDING ENVELOPE REQUIREMENTS – OPAQUE ASSEMBLIES
 
ROOFS

INSULATION ENTIRELY ABOVE DECK 

Climate Zone             R-Value

1                                                          15

2                                                          20

3                                                          20

4                                                           20

5                                                           20

6                                                           20

7                                                           25

8                                                           25

Monday, July 22, 2013

How to Properly Determine Moisture Content in Roof Systems

John A. D’Annunzio

When properly completed the determination of moisture content utilizes advanced technological equipment, laboratory testing and scientific equations.  The process has advanced to the point where analysis can be objective and reliable.  This phase of the industry has advanced from the days of the ‘educated’ toe and subjective claims of how the system felt as it was walked across.


Standard Moisture Analysis Procedures


Proper analysis includes a combination of both non-destructive and destructive methods of testing.  Investigations completed using only one of these methods are insufficient and lack creditability.  The equipment used to conduct non-destructive tests provides analysis (a snapshot) of the overall roof conditions of large expansive areas in a quick and efficient manner.  Destructive testing – coupled with gravimetric tests – are required to verify the conditions observed by the moisture analysis equipment.
 
There are three types of non-destructive testing equipment:

  1. Impedance or Capacitance
  2. Infrared
  3. Nuclear
Impedance or capacitance moisture testing is conducted using a variety of small hand held meters that – when set over the roof membrane – emit low frequency electronic signals from rubber electrodes located at the base of the instrument.  These types of meters typically determine if a specific roof area is either wet or dry.  They do not have the capacity to measure the percentage of moisture present. Dry readings are projected at points where the electrodes are insulated from one another and there is not a complete electrical circuit.  The electrical conductance is greater at wet areas, which provides a complete electrical circuit.

Impedance testing can be conducted in a pattern or at various points throughout the roof area.  A higher number of readings provide more cohesive moisture determination.  The testing cannot be completed over wet or ponded areas and modified instruments are typically required for EPDM roof systems.

Infrared thermography is conducted with the use of an infrared camera.  An infrared camera detects the temperature of the areas within a roof system and identifies temperature differentials throughout the area.  Infrared scanning is most effective after sunset because as the air temperature decreases the dry insulation allows the roof to cool quickly.  In areas where moisture is present – insulation or membrane – take longer to cool due to a large thermal mass that is developed in these areas. 

Thermal mass or ‘hot spots’ are not always an indication of moisture presence.  They can be illustrated at under deck heating or cooling vents, venting of hot fumes, moisture on the roof surface (ponded water), or at points of heavy gravel application.  Most infrared cameras require clear weather conditions for an external period prior to and during the testing.  This typically includes no recent or current precipitation, heavy cloud cover or windy conditions.  Any – or all – of these conditions could distort the infrared findings.

Nuclear thermography is conducted using a nuclear scanning meter that emits neutrons from a radiation source from the scanning meter down through the roof assembly.  The emitted neutrons that encounter hydrogen atoms in the roof assembly are slowed down and bounced back to the counting detector within the scanning meter.  Higher levels of slowed neutrons are recorded at wet areas because water contains a significant amount of hydrogen atoms.  The recorded reading is an average of the total roof assembly. 

Generally, nuclear scanning can be completed to depths as much as seven inches and testing can be conducted in areas of ponded water.  Testing is conducted over the entire roof area by sectioning the roof into grids (5’x 5’ or 10’ x 10’) and recording the readings at each of these locations.   

 

Moisture Verification


After visually inspecting all of the roof areas, making notes of all of the conditions, defects and problems it is important to find out the true conditions of the roof system.  This is done by extracting a test sample or core cut from the roof area.  Core cuts are conducted in a roof analysis because each of the moisture analysis methods has their limitations, and thorough diagnosis of a roof system requires core cuts.  Moisture identified by non-destructive moisture testing is relative and must be quantified by a combination of physical core cuts and gravimetric analysis. 

The extraction process of core cuts is similar if the sample is to determine construction or condition of the roof system.  The differences are in the type of forensic testing that is conducted on the test samples.  In the moisture analysis procedure the core cuts are extracted to determine both the construction and condition of the existing roof system.  For these purposes, the core cuts can be completed in the following manner for all types of roof systems:
 
1.        Identify the appropriate location of the test cut.  The proper area should be representative of the entire roof area construction.  Do not take a test cut at a previously repaired area.

2.      Take one test cut per moisture representative in each roof area.  A test cut should be extracted from those areas determined to be dry, and areas found to have varying levels of moisture presence; low, medium, or high. Facilities with multiple roof areas and/or multiple roof systems require test cuts from each roof area.

3.      Identify the location(s) of the test cut(s) on the roof plan.

4.      Use a 12” x 12” template and measure the area to be cut at 12” x 12”.
 
5.      Following the established 12” x 12” pattern cut the membrane, any insulation(s) and underlayment(s) to the structural deck.  Single ply systems can be cut with scissors.  Bituminous roof systems require a box cutter knife or hatchet.
 
      6.      Remove all roof system components, (membrane, insulation, and underlayment) from
               the opening.
 
  1.      Photograph the system components and structural deck substrate.
     8.        Record system construction components identifying the method of attachment of each
                component, including:
 
1.      deck type
2.      underlayment (if used)
3.      insulation type, thickness and condition (each layer)
4.      method of insulation attachment (each layer)
5.      membrane type, thickness and condition
6.      method of membrane attachment
7.      type of surfacing and method of attachment
 
The core samples should be placed in a watertight container and immediately transported to an approved testing facility for gravimetric testing. 

Gravimetric testing is conducted by separating each roof assembly component

Friday, July 19, 2013

Common Signs That Roof Replacement is Neccessary

John A. D'Annunzio
 
Common Signs That Roof Replacement is Necessary:

Although all roof membranes have different physical properties and failure modes there are certain deficiencies that are common to all roof membranes. Here are some common failure modes in all roof membranes to look out for:

 

1.      Brittleness: All roof membranes become brittle at the end of their service life. This phenomenon is more rapid in some membranes. Once the material becomes brittle it losses the elasticity required to provide weatherproofing service. The material can be tested (tensile/elongation tests) to determine remaining service life or failure can be illustrated through grazing/cracks and splits in the membrane surface. Visual observation of material scrim or reinforcement is also an indication of material failure.

 

2.      Wet Insulation: All roof insulations lose structural and thermal integrity once they are wet. All wet insulation should be removed from the system to avoid costly structural deck damage (particularly on metal decks). Typically, if more than 25% of a roof system has wet insulation a full roof replacement is recommended. Wet insulation can be determined by any method of moisture testing. If non-destructive moisture testing is conducted Gravimetric Testing should be conducted to verify that the material is wet. Some adhered membranes will illustrate wet insulation through excessive blistering and membrane ridging.

 

3.      Flashings/Penetrations: Flashings and penetrations are the most vulnerable point of a roof system and nearly two-thirds of all roof leaks occur at these points. Openings, splits and sagging of flashings materials are common causes of roof leaks. Excessive openings or displacement of these materials can lead to free flow of moisture infiltration into the system and the building.

 

Paragon has developed a specific material testing program that can identify the remaining service life of an existing membrane; Forensic Analytical Serviceability Tracker (FAST)

 

Contact us at 810.343.3781 or John_paragon@ameritech.net to see how FAST can work for you.