John A. D’Annunzio
System attachment is the most
critical element of roof design and application. Improper attachment results in the increased
probability of wind blow-offs and contributes to membrane strain created by
differential movement of the system components.
The design and application methods must address attachment of the total
system and all of the components – substrate, roofing, flashing, metal
coverings and penetrations. The most
prevalent element that proper attachment will deter is damage from wind force,
particularly wind uplift damage.
Wind
damage of roof systems primarily initiates at perimeters and corners of the
building and infiltrates throughout the field of the system. Generally, wind vortexes occur at the
perimeter of the building displacing perimeter components (flashings, wood
nailers, metal coverings, etc.) creating openings for wind entry into the
system. The wind transcends through the
system in a cross directional pattern creating uplift and damage at points
throughout the field of the system. Wind
uplift can also occur from below the deck in facilities damaged by wind from
interior entry points, such as windows, doors, overhead doors, etc. Secondary wind damage can also occur at the
roof from membrane protrusions created by wind driven projectiles.
High
Velocity Wind Classifications
There
are four high wind velocity classifications, which range from 39 mph to in
excess of 300 mph. The most common type
of wind is a gale force wind, which can vary in wind speed from 39 to 72
mph. These types of winds are steady in
velocity and have sporadic gusts. Wind
forces in combination with thunder, electric storms and heavy rainfall are
referred to as squalls. Squalls can
range up to 90 mph. Even though gales and squalls have the least amount of wind
force of the four classifications, they contribute to over 70% of the wind
related claims per year. This is largely
due to their common occurrences in most U.S. regions.
Hurricanes
primarily occur in the Gulf and Atlantic costal regions and contribute to wide
spread damage. Most hurricanes form in
the Atlantic as tropical storms, when they exceed 73 mph they reach hurricane
status. There are five levels of
hurricanes, which are categorized by wind speeds. Hurricanes typically occur between the end of
May through November – the official hurricane season.
Tornadoes
are characterized as severe squalls with the addition of a funnel
(vortex). Wind speeds are high and
typically immeasurable. They have been
estimated to be between 200 to 300 mph within the vortex. They are most common in the central United
States in the spring, however, they can – and have – occurred in other regions
at other times of the year.
Effects of High Velocity Wind Speeds on Roofs
Wind, especially at high
velocity, creates vacuum or negative pressure, lifting the membrane and roof
insulation material loose from points of attachment. Wind uplift is severe at the roof perimeter
primarily at corners, where it exceeds the normal static pressure against the
wall.
Wind damage to roofs also occurs
through membrane punctures created by the impact of wind driven
projectiles. The projectiles typically
consist of roof components (metal terminations, flashings, membrane, tiles,
etc.) or mechanical equipment displaced in windstorms. In most cases, the
projectiles are from adjoining roofs or surrounding buildings that puncture
roofs otherwise unaffected by wind damage.
The membrane openings created by
these impacts allow for the free flow of moisture into the roof system during
the rainstorms that characteristically follow these events. Since the International Building Code states
that roof systems with more than 25% of wet insulation require roof removal to
the deck, the cost of collateral damage from wind- storms can be excessive.
Required Changes in Design, Manufacturing and Application
Proactive measures are required
to decrease roof damage in high velocity wind zones. These changes are required throughout the
roofing process during the design, manufacturing and application phases:
1. Design
for Attachment: Wind uplift damage can be
significantly reduced through the design and implementation of proper roof
attachment procedures. Proper roof
attachment can be determined in accordance with FM requirements or ASCE
Standard Wind-Uplift calculations. The procedure to determine wind uplift
pressure rating on specific buildings during the design phase is based a
calculation that takes into account the basic wind speed in the geographical
area, ground surrounding the building and the roof uplift pressure at the field
of the roof. The buildings height and
perimeter construction are also considered.
It is the responsibility of the specifier to complete these calculations
and to determine the proper wind uplift rating for the building. Only materials and systems that meet the
calculated uplift pressures should be applied.
The calculated pressure is applicable for the
determination of the entire roof system – roof deck and all above grade
components. However, this procedure only
determines attachment rates for the field of the roof. The pressures required for corners and
perimeters must be calculated separately.
2. Manufacture of Impact Resistant
Membranes: The application of impact resistant
membranes would significantly reduce collateral damage to the roofs that
illustrated no other signs of wind-uplift damage. Regulations could be implemented utilizing
the current ASTM impact resistance testing standards.
3. Compliance During Application: The largest impact that these potential
changes could have will be the compliance of the contractor during the
application phase. The current
wind-uplift requirements are typically only monitored through the design
phase. This includes the manufacturers
system testing, which is conducted in a controlled setting with materials that
may or may not be applied on all roof projects.
Some roof specifications and designs are reviewed for code compliance. However, there are no current regulations for
the verification of the completed systems attachment methods. Due to the fact that insurance companies will
be forced to pay claims on roof systems that possessed improprieties of
application, a concentrated effort may begin to verify what they are insuring
prior to a catastrophic event.
The costs associated with
application verification may be prohibitive due to the scale of the task. However, in a year where the insurance
companies are paying billions of dollars for roof and associated collateral
damage (interior repairs, loss of production, temporary housing, etc.) this
issue may rise to the top of the agenda.
Some insurance carriers have maintained a proactive stance in this area
and have existing verification methods in place. The remaining insurers may begin requiring
their insured building owners to provide roof system compliance verification as
a stipulation of their policy.
Required Building Code Changes
The only way to enact these
changes is through the implementation of more stringent codes in all high
velocity wind zones. This would include
the Gulf and Atlantic coastal regions and should include inland areas a minimum
of 100 miles from the coast. The current
codes make reference to the FM and ASCE attachment methods; however, they are
primarily enforced in the design phase and the codes do not address project
compliance.
Proper code implementation should
mandate regulations as stringent as the high velocity section of the Florida
Building Code. These sections can serve
as an effective template for code development, particularly due to the fact
that they have been in effect for over a decade. Proper code development requires
implementation of standards that address all phases of roofing: design,
manufacture and application.
The success of the code will be
based on the ability to complete project compliance inspections. Most of the wind related failures that we
have observed over the years were initiated by improper application methods. Typically, project design is reviewed and
approved (or rejected) by code agencies prior to construction; however, actual
application practices are not always inspected.
The primary reason typically stated for this oversight is that the local
agencies (code enforcement and/or insurance companies) lack the manpower
required too complete such a daunting task.
The failure of this reasoning is that other building components – such
as structural, electrical, mechanical and plumbing - have required compliance
inspections on all facilities.
Therefore, additional manpower may not be required; roof attachment
inspections could become part of the structural inspections.
Code enforcement should be
maintained at the local municipality level and can be monitored through the
issuance of mandatory permits for all roofing projects (commercial and
residential, new construction and remedial projects). The issuance of permits (prior to project
inception) can be based on the following criteria:
1.
ASCE wind uplift calculations are prepared by a
licensed engineer for the specific project facility to determine the wind
uplift pressure for the facility and to determine the proper attachment
requirements.
2.
Fastener pull-out tests are required to determine the
attachment capacity of the existing substrate.
3.
Materials and/or systems should comply with identified
high velocity wind regulations. This
would include – but is not limited to – wind uplift testing and puncture
resistance testing.
Once the permits are issued and
the project begins, code compliance can be enforced through mandatory project
inspections. Code compliance inspections
must be completed at the following intervals:
1.
Substrate Attachment: To ensure application
attachment methods are in compliance with the approved project design
requirements. These inspections would
include attachment of the underlayment, insulation and/or membrane on low-slope
applications and title, shingle, and/or standing seam metal attachment on steep-slope
applications. Application at the field
of the roof and the wind vulnerable edges must be inspected.
2.
Final Inspection: To ensure that the roof system
is applied in compliance with the approved project design requirements. Tile uplift tests and/or specific material
extraction may be required to determine project application methods.
The intent of the proposed roof
attachment codes is to minimize structural damage and limit associated human
health and safety risks in high velocity wind events. These code changes will not eliminate all
wind related roof damage, but they will greatly reduce damage initiated by
improper attachment methods and flying projectiles. The cost savings realized by these codes for
insurance companies, building owners and municipalities (State and Local
levels) could be substantial. The
potential savings to human health and safety would be immeasurable.
No comments:
Post a Comment